Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUse.com Web
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Parade Games
  • Parade
  • Pirates Report
  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites
Community

Coal-to-Liquid W.Va’s ‘Future’

McGeehan looks for Mingo County plant decision to have huge impact

By IAN HICKS Staff Writer
POSTED: December 17, 2009

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's decision regarding a proposed coal-to-liquid plant in Mingo County could have a huge impact on future investment in the Northern Panhandle, according to Delegate Pat McGeehan.

The DEP's Division of Air Quality will hold a public meeting at 6 p.m. today at the Larry Joe Harless Community Center in Gilbert, W.Va., before deciding whether to issue a permit to TransGas Development, which is seeking to build a $2.5 billion coal-to-gasoline facility near Wharncliffe, W.Va. - a town about a mile away from the West Virginia-Kentucky border.

McGeehan, R-Hancock, has spent much of the past year recruiting investors in an effort to bring such a plant to Weirton. He said the Mountain State needs to send a clear message to potential coal-to-liquid entrepreneurs that such technology is welcome. He recently sent a letter to DEP Secretary Randy Huffman, urging the department to grant the TransGas permit "with due haste."

"If this permit is denied, investment in this emerging industry could likely evaporate, as our government would indirectly be sending a signal that future projects will not be allowed," McGeehan said Wednesday.

McGeehan believes Weirton's proximity to large population centers as well as its access to rail and barge transportation would make the city attractive to prospective coal gasification investors.

"The faster we can implement these projects, the more employment we can generate and, ultimately, the more prosperity that will come to not just West Virginia, but the Northern Panhandle," he said.

McGeehan's letter to Huffman claims the potential construction of a coal-to-liquid plant in West Virginia "truly brings a new era to the Mountain State and will help West Virginia turn the corner on the global recession we all face." It goes on to point out the dwindling population and decline of the steel industry in Weirton.

"With little employment opportunity, our children have been forced to leave behind their families and the Mountain State altogether," he states.

McGeehan also believes coal-to-liquid technology reduces America's dependence on foreign oil. He noted several groups who support cap and trade legislation presently before the U.S. Senate are expected to attend today's meeting to protest the proposed Mingo County plant.

"There are a lot of different environmental groups out there right now that oppose this," he said, adding that he can't figure out why. "Where's their agenda at? What are they pushing for?"

McGeehan pointed out many of the same groups who support cap and trade also are anti-war - a position he believes can be advanced by exploring alternatives to foreign oil.

"That essentially is a major reason why we have a presence in the Middle East - to protect that strong national interest," he said.

McGeehan urged his constituents to get involved by contacting his federal counterparts and sounding off on cap and trade, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives this summer and calls for a drastic reduction in carbon emissions in coming years.

Market uncertainty and fear of investment, McGeehan said, will be a direct result of expanding government regulation of industry.

"If we can prevent that from happening, we can offer a much clearer signal that we welcome this type of technology," he said.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-2 | Post a comment
Wheeldog
12-17-09 4:00 PM
CTL faces some major hurdles before it can become a truly viable process. First and foremost, it has to make a profit. When factoring in all costs from accessing the resource to making the end product available at the pump and then adding in environmental reclamation and capture and disposal of toxic wastes, CTL has a relatively low return on investment. New technology may bring the cost down somewhat, but the price of oil would have to go well beyond triple digits to make CTL truly profitable. Even then the rate of production would not fill the widening void left by declining oil production and growing demand for liquid energy.

cory1978
12-17-09 9:56 AM
Wonderful news but with WV's business history......it will be taxed into non-existance or it will be built in another state.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Special Sections  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries