Learning What Went Wrong
The IntelligencerResults of tax levy questions on the Tuesday election ballot in Belmont County were puzzling, in some ways. Two school levies and a countywide issue to support social services were defeated by voters. A levy to support the Bellaire Police Department also failed.
Yet elsewhere in East Ohio, school levies were approved by voters. And some levies in Belmont County, including one to fund police in St. Clairsville, were approved.
It can be imprudent to reach sweeping conclusions about election returns. Still, it seems to us that voters' reactions to levy proposals were not based on a generalized anti-tax sentiment in East Ohio. Again, some levies were approved by voters - sometimes by wide margins. In Shadyside, voters approved a levy for village government but rejected one for the school system.
Clearly those who voted against levy proposals were not sold on the need for taxes.
Both the Shadyside and Bridgeport school levy proposals were for renewals of existing taxes. In both communities, the levies were rejected by substantial, though not overwhelming, margins. Shadyside's proposal was defeated by a vote of 1,124 to 896, according to unofficial returns. In Bridgeport, the vote was 859 to 773.
Failure of the levies for Shadyside and Bridgeport schools will have a major negative effect, unless the districts try again to receive voter approval. If they do so, it is clear that school officials must do a much better job of explaining why they need money from the levies. Before any firm decisions on whether to submit the levies to voters again are reached, officials in both school districts should undertake objective evaluations of what went wrong - and of what needs to be done to regain the confidence of voters.
|
Reactionary
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-08-09 9:56 AM
|
Lorenzo--People are going to continue to leave because there is no future her for the young folks. Not long, down the road, the Valley will be mostly older folks with no children , and the Welfare crowd. It's there now, just look around. I'm just stating an observation. Pumping $$$ into dying school districts just doesn't make any sense. Consolidation will be a fact for a lot of local districts in Ohio. The money just isn't there. And as deerwatchers states, going to the County level school district might be an option. After all , it does follow the liberal/socialist pattern of Central Location, Central Control. It just doesn't employ as many N E A / A F T teachers. And that's the real rub,...ain't it?
|
|
EllisWyatt
|
|
|
11-07-09 10:04 AM
|
Education is YOUR responsibility, like housing, food, clothing and healthcare. The only people who demand public this and that are those who pay little or no taxes.
|
|
beach1
|
|
|
11-06-09 4:03 PM
|
THE WORKING PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF PAYING FOR THOSE THAT DON'T! SCHOOLS ARE LOADED WITH KIDS FROM MOTHERS THAT HAVE FOUR OR FIVE KIDS AND DON'T CONTRIBUTE ONE PENNY TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR DONATE THEIR TIME WHICH WOULD BE BENEATH THEIR DIGNITY TO HELP OUT A LITTLE. WHEN WE FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SENIOR FUND THAT IS MISSING WE MIGHT AGAIN VOTE FOR A SOCIAL LEVY!
|
|
TruthSeeker
|
|
|
11-06-09 10:47 AM
|
I'm curious as to what you mean, Mikey, by what went wrong. Nothing went wrong. The people voted it down. It's funny, you also seem to think the 2008 election went "wrong" too but again, the people spoke.
|
|
deerwatchers
|
|
|
11-06-09 9:41 AM
|
Reduce administrative cost by combine school districts into county school? Why are we paying $100,000 per super. a year? They are only running one or two schools! We can do better. We pay enough. It is just being managed poorly.
|
|
Lorenzo
|
|
|
11-06-09 7:27 AM
|
More people will continue leave if schools are neglected and the work force stays education-neutral, and fewer "taxpayers" will ever bother to move into such neglect. Investing in the future should not be an impossible idea.
|
|
EllisWyatt
|
|
|
11-06-09 6:19 AM
|
What went wrong for who? If you mean local government, you could say this was a negative result. If you are talking about local taxpayers, however, nothing went wrong. This valley is losing jobs and population (and taxpayers). Those remaining have lost their jobs, have taken pay cuts, are sharing a higher tax burden, struggling financially, etc. Yet, local political hacks demand more and more money? Wake up! Taxpayers have to tighten their belts; why can't government? I would be willing to bet that those who voted against the taxes are taxpayers and those who voted in favor pay no taxes. That is a serious problem on a national scale because few people actually pay income taxes, while more than 52% of the nation receives some form of government check.
|









