Feds Tell House to Back Off
Mollohan under investigation by committeeBy JOSELYN KING With AP Dispatches
Article Photos
WHEELING - Leaked documents that surfaced this week reveal that the U.S. Justice Department asked the House Ethics Committee last summer to back off its investigation of U.S. Rep. Alan Mollohan.
The move typically means that federal law enforcement wants to move further on its own investigation and doesn't want a separate Congressional investigation to interfere with its probe.
On Friday Mollohan, D-W.Va., remained adamant that he is not aware of being the subject of any federal investigation.
"As I have said a number of times in the past, I do not know whether any investigation is ongoing or not," Mollohan said. "I have not been contacted."
Internal investigations into the conduct of more than two dozen House members were exposed this week in an extraordinary, Internet-era breach involving the secretive process by which Congress polices lawmaker ethics. House Ethics Committee Chairwoman U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., announced Thursday that a confidential weekly report of the committee from July had leaked out in a case of ''cyber-hacking.''
A committee statement said its security was breached through ''peer to peer file sharing software'' used by a junior employee who was working from home. The employee was fired.
Mollohan's name was among those surfacing in the leaked report, as the committee was asked to suspend its investigation of Mollohan, whose personal finances and dealings have been under scrutiny since 2006.
In 2006, Mollohan served as ranking Democrat on the House Ethics Committee, and he was asked about the committee's investigation of then-U.S. Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio. Mollohan said at that time that he could not comment regarding investigations of members.
"But if we undertake an investigation of an individual - and the U.S. Justice Department is also investigating this individual - the Justice Department feels we could be interfering and undermining their ability to prosecute if some of the testimony and information were to become public.
"They could recommend that we suspend our investigation. We don't have to do this, but we would seriously consider their request," Mollohan said in 2006.
Ney later that year was indicted on federal charges and eventually served time in prison.
Allegations of corruption - and reports of a subsequent federal investigation - first surfaced against Mollohan in 2006. That was when the National Legal and Policy Center in Washington issued a report outlining allegations concerning the congressman's dealings with nonprofits in West Virginia and his personal wealth.
No charges have ever been filed against Mollohan, and there has never been an official announcement that he has been cleared of any allegations. The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to respond to repeated requests for comment from The Intelligencer and Wheeling News-Register over the past several months.
Mollohan has said repeatedly that he has not been informed of any federal investigation pertaining to his dealings.
He presently serves as chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies - the committee that sets the budget for both the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI.
Mollohan had vowed he would abstain from any votes pertaining to the agencies while he was under investigation. This year, he nevertheless participated in approving their appropriations.
It was the National Legal and Policy Center that first began asking questions about Mollohan's dealings and personal wealth in April 2006. At that time, its findings were turned over to the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI.
Allegations indicate Mollohan earmarked $369 million in federal grants to his district for 254 separate projects between 1997 and 2006, and that more than $200 million of that money was directed to five nonprofit organizations staffed by his friends and colleagues.
The Associated Press, citing a Washington Post article, reports the leaked document was disclosed on a publicly accessible computer network and made available to the newspaper by a source familiar with such networks.
According to the article, more than 30 lawmakers and a few staff members were under scrutiny by the House Ethics Committee, including nearly half the members of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.
The names included three lawmakers previously identified in the inquiry: the chairman of the defense subcommittee, U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; and Reps. Peter Visclosky, D-Ind., and James Moran, D-Va.
The Post said others whose names were in the report included Reps. Norm Dicks, D-Wash.; Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio; C.W. Bill Young, R-Fla.; and Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan.
The Ethics Committee, however, has not announced an investigation of any of these lawmakers.
|
billwv68
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-03-09 8:17 AM
|
We just need to get rid of the whole bunch and start over....Don't forget to vote!!
|
|
JamesT
|
|
|
11-02-09 10:41 AM
|
Double standards... GOP get caught, they lose thier office. Dems get caught they stay in. Quid pro quid is Washington's way of business and from former West Virginia Stae Senate Thias Blathick accepting bribes for gambling passage in the form of property to her nephew Stae Senator Edwin Bowman being paid over $ 80,000 annaully by Mountaineer Gamming for manageing thier golf course ' Woodview" to Mollohan's property gift from lobbyist like Criss Dodd's deal from " Friend's of Angelo " Countrywide we see the prostitutes from local to national politicians. The one constant is the hypocracy of the Democartic Party " Policing Themselves" to the lies and deception from the Chicago run White House and mob style politics from Nancy Pelosi and company. The Democratic Party has made West Virginia a one party socialist welfare state!
|
|
bassman
|
|
|
11-02-09 7:08 AM
|
What about old Sandy Berger stuffing top secret papers into his socks and taking them home? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
|
|
bassman
|
|
|
11-02-09 7:04 AM
|
Do any of you Libs know who really "outed" Plame? I doubt it so I will tell you. Dick Armitage! He said he did it and there was no consequences! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
|
|
BigMike
|
|
|
11-01-09 8:45 PM
|
BurningUp07 FYI: A Chinese wind-turbine company, with financing help from Beijing, has struck a deal to be the exclusive supplier to one of the largest wind-farm developments in the U.S., a sign of how Chinese firms are aggressively capitalizing on America's clean-energy push. The 36,000-acre development in West Texas would receive $1.5 billion in financing through Export-Import Bank of China. Shenyang Power Group, a five-month-old alliance, would supply the project with 240 of its 2.5-megawatt wind turbines, among the biggest made in the world.
|
|
BurningUp07
|
|
|
11-01-09 3:52 PM
|
GE announces battery factory for upstate NY... What's WV and the unions doing? - Absolutely nothing. ****earth2tech****/2009/05/12/ge-to-invest-100m-in-new-york-battery-plant-hoping-for-stimulus-bucks/
|
|
Graysongs
|
|
|
11-01-09 2:18 PM
|
tmoore - The results of these 3 oddball elections next week may be some serious screws to BoyObaMao's agenda. The best he can hope for is to see his kind eke out a win in NJ. VA is a virtual lock for someone openly opposed to him and the race in NY looks very likely to go against his plans. How many Dems will be heading for the lifeboats while their party leadership shrieks at them to "get back here!"?
|
|
tmoore
|
|
|
11-01-09 11:13 AM
|
Nancy,did Bill C lie about sex with that girl???mmmmmmmm
|
|
tmoore
|
|
|
11-01-09 11:05 AM
|
Truthseeker should travel to Thomas WV and ask a few questions of the locals. Dumb as-
|
|
Graysongs
|
|
|
10-31-09 6:01 PM
|
This could be the professional "career prosecutors" in the Justice Department letting Congress know that they're not going to let them go on covering up for this guy and others. I truly hope that's the case.
|
|
beach1
|
|
|
10-31-09 5:13 PM
|
mollohan,wrangel,jefferson,boxer,the only democrat to ever be convicted was the good guy from younstown,traficant.they are in charge and this administration and the clown lies to the american people every day and is protected by the media!
|
|
walksabout
|
|
|
10-31-09 5:05 PM
|
ok. I will say it best. there are no mistakes in politics. Nobody proposes a bill without side agreements and promise they can re introduce the failed bill under another name if the public catches on. Nobody calls attention to any problem until they first line their buddies and themselves up to sell the solution.
|
|
walksabout
|
|
|
10-31-09 5:02 PM
|
what about acorn ? what about the 1.7 million $ spent for alledgedly nothing regarding some papers ? I tell you. the liberals elected a gaggle of real wackjobs
|
|
walksabout
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:59 PM
|
wonder-Guess we will wait and see what happens and not play it out in the minds clearly your mind has played out. If you can't read the signs, please don't lad anybody anywhere you go.
|
|
1whoworks
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:49 PM
|
Wonder, I have some problems with some CEO pay packages and the country club way that they have with respect to nominations. However, MOST incentive plans are based on performance factors that the board of directors lays out and the shareholders vote on. Generally they pick out specific measures that they believe will improve the business. Insurance companies are businesses and employ thousands, all who pay taxes and contribute to this society. As for their CEOs and boards I would prefer to take them on a case by case basis. I have very strong negative feelings against politicians who are supposed to be looking out for the country and really look out for themselves. Mollohan inherited his Daddys seat on name recognition and has made a fortune since. I have no respect for him. NONE!
|
|
vietnamvet
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:47 PM
|
Haven't been here for a while but see nothing has changed. No matter what the article is about, some only want to talk about the last administration. We should be talking about what’s happening NOW not what happened 4 or 5 years ago..
|
|
wonderwhy
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:16 PM
|
Guess we will wait and see what happens and not play it out in the minds of people that dislike him? Sort of how you guys are defending cheney?
|
|
wonderwhy
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:16 PM
|
Guess we will wait and see what happens and not play it out in the minds of people that dislike him? Sort of how you guys are defending cheney?
|
|
wonderwhy
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:13 PM
|
btw- this article is poorly titled with a slanted opinion. guess that is status quo for the NR (not reliable)
|
|
wonderwhy
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:12 PM
|
sort of like the health insurace ceo's giving themselves bloated bonuses?
|
|
rblyel9420
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:12 PM
|
cheney never lied... and bush never lied...it was a lie started by the left......and lots of idiots dont know any better so they just choose to believe it...cause they've been taught to hate the right....they dont know why but they hate them.............kind of like middle east countries that are told and taught to hate americans as youngsters.....they just dont know any better so they believe it........truth doesnt matter any more..thats a shame.......
|
|
Graysongs
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:04 PM
|
wonderwhy - Those who become wealthy while pretending to be involved in "public service" are what are know as crooked politicians. No, I'm not envious of a thief or a criminal which is what Mollohan is. Things obtained dishonestly might taste sweet, but they're poison.
|
|
EllisWyatt
|
|
|
10-31-09 3:28 PM
|
Maybe Nancy can explain to us how Plame was a "covert officer" with the CIA when, in fact, she was not permanently stationed overseas. Anything else is worthless. According to National Security laws, Plame would have had a permanent covert assignment overseas for her to have been covered by the law. When her name was leaked, she was working every day in an office at Langley. She was not exactly "covert". A) She was not permanently assigned overseas. B) She hadn't had a covert assignment within the 5-year period prior to the leak of her name. C) At the time of the leak, she was officially working in Ops at Langley. Real secret agent, that Plame! Nancy, please stop reading your talking points from the DNC. If Libby/Cheney/Bush were guilty, why was it that NO ONE was prosecuted for disclosing her identity? A) It wasn't a crime. B) There is no proof that any administration officials are to blame. Nancy-why don't you start thinking for yourself.
|
|
wonderwhy
|
|
|
10-31-09 2:51 PM
|
iwhoworks- are you likening that to ceo for insuance co's?
|
|
1whoworks
|
|
|
10-31-09 2:39 PM
|
Sounds to me like he is angry the he made it off of our backs! And by questionable means.
|







