Mobile Version: mobile.theintelligencer.net
 
RSS:
Wheeling Weather Forecast, WV
»BREAKING NEWS» UPDATE: 12:45 p.m.: Gulf oil platform explodes, burning off La. coast
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUse.com Web
Special Sections  Football Preview 2010  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Election 2010
  • Digging Deeper Into The Marcellus Shale
  • Parade Games
  • Parade
  • Pirates Report
  • Online Extras
  • I Love to Travel
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites

Issue 6 Vies to Put First Casino in Ohio

By JOSELYN KING
POSTED: October 28, 2008

Article Photos


ST. CLAIRSVILLE - Ohio could get its first gambling casino if voters approve of it on Nov. 4.

Supporters of Issue 6 say the bill would bring 5,000 jobs to Ohio and that counties would benefit from the tax revenue.

Opponents, meanwhile, point out that Ohio's general fund would receive no tax revenue from the casino.

Issue 6 would authorize the construction of a privately owned casino in Clinton County in Southwest Ohio. The effort would mean an investment of $600 million in a casino being promoted by "My Ohio Now" that would be run by Lakes Entertainment of Minneapolis, Minn.

Just as West Virginia's counties have received a share of gambling tax revenues in that state, Ohio's counties are set to benefit from the casino under current plans.

The constitutional amendment that will appear before voters would require the casino to pay a tax of up to 30 percent on its gross receipts after payouts. The taxes are to be used first to pay expenses of regulating and collecting taxes from the casino, then for funding of gambling prevention and treatment programs.

The remainder would be distributed with 10 percent to go to Clinton County and 90 percent to Ohio's other 87 counties, based on population.

If another casino were to be permitted in Ohio, the tax to be paid by the Clinton County casino would be reduced as a result. It would pay the rate taxed on the second casino or 25 percent.

If approved, Issue 6 would authorize the casino to conduct any gambling presently permitted in Nevada or any state adjacent to Ohio. This would include "any type of card or table games, slot machines and electronic gaming devices - except bets on races or sporting events," according to the ballot language.

Only people age 21 and over would be permitted to place bets. Amounts of bets would not be subject to any limits now or in the future.

  • My Ohio Now - the group encouraging a "yes" vote on Issue 6 - points not just to the 5,000 jobs expected to be created in the state, but adds that these are higher-paying jobs that cannot be outsourced.

According to arguments filed with the Ohio Secretary of State's Office, the group anticipates that "thousands of new construction jobs" also will be required "to develop and construct the casino, hotel, restaurants, golf course, live theater and other amenities one finds at a first class casino resort."

My Ohio Now said the casino will generate an estimated $200 million annually from a special tax that only the casino operator will pay.

"The vast majority of this tax will be distributed to every Ohio county government based on the county's population," the group states in its arguments. "Additionally, the casino operator will also pay taxes that other businesses pay, including property and income taxes."

The proposed casino would encompass 94 acres.

"Issue 6 will allow Ohio to compete with the 38 other states that currently allow casino gambling," My Ohio Now comments. "Not only will it stop the flow of money from Ohio to other states - including our neighbor states of Indiana, Michigan, West Virginia and Pennsylvania - it will also be an economic stimulus for Ohio as a result of the out of state customers spending money at the casino resort."

  • The Vote No Casinos Committee contends that having a casino in Ohio won't stop state residents from taking their money to neighboring states to gamble. The committee is co-chaired by current U.S. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio.

The committee is quick to point out that Lakes Entertainment is an out-of-state company based in Minneapolis.

"Issue 6 will drain billions from Ohioans' wallets and send that money to Lake's Entertainment owners - who don't live in Ohio or pay taxes in Ohio," it writes in its arguments.

The committee has its own battle cry - "Remember the lottery?"

State lottery funds initially were intended to benefit Ohio's schools, they point out. But school budgets haven't seen an increase because of the lottery funding.

"Casinos won't save county budgets either," the opponents state. "Passing Issue 6 could make levies for vital social services tougher to pass."

And the language promising money to counties is filled with loopholes, the committee claims.

"There is no guarantee that the counties will see any revenue and could end up with nothing when another casino opens in Ohio," they state.

The casino "will hurt honest businesses in Clinton County" - as well as the people of Wilmington who voted overwhelmingly against casinos in 2006, the committee notes.

Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-6 | Post a comment
EllisWyatt
10-29-08 6:41 AM
Gambling is a joke. West Virginia, a poor state, relies on its' poor residents losing their money at its' casinos. The Island laid off hundreds when the table gaming legislation originially failed to pass then they hired out of state people to put up billboards and hand out flyers saying "vote yes for jobs". Well, what jobs? Drug dealing and prostitution are jobs, aren't they?

Then, of course, the big lies. We're "creating" hundreds of new jobs (after we laid off hundreds) with training (for which you pay and government level background checks, as well), for pay that is up to $35,000 per year (low wage but you can make that much with tips) and benefits (what kind? how expensive?)

I am tired of the lies. Cabela's promised jobs paying $30,000 + and benefits. Does anyone here know of anyone at Cabela's earning $30,000 +? Those wage promises were printed in this paper so please don't try and deny it.

Retail is fine, gambling is not and neither creates family suppor

Patterson
10-28-08 7:23 PM
UNCOMMONSENSE says it best...who benefits from these casinos. Surely the employees don't sustain a 'reasonable' living. Secondly, what determines where a casino is located??

Another industry that benefits ONLY the significant few.

UNCOMMONSENSE
10-28-08 2:11 PM
I like the ad that touts "jobs that can't be outsourced"!!

Well, the hamburger flipper at the local McDonalds ALSO holds one of these low paying jobs that "can't be outsourced"

But he ALSO can't support his family on such income.

We don't need any more low paying service industry jobs.

We need REAL jobs with REAL paychecks.

kaiserhund
10-28-08 9:32 AM
When will these states realize that gambling is not the answer to good economic development. Yes they bring some jobs, but most of them are low wage ones. as more and more states allow gambling, gambling revene will decline. Look at atlantic city. The boardwalk had all the casinos, while the rest of the town is a run down. The same can be said for wheeling.

hellbilly
10-28-08 8:44 AM
Who was it who decided that we need casinos anyway?Gambling is sucking your money away in the lore of a big winning payday.There are coffee shops on every corner of marshall and ohio county,some owned by our own politicians,lawers and commnity leaders,praying on people for their money.Its the most popular places for west virginians,and ohio players to spend their welfare checks,Ohio just wants in on the easy money

billybob
10-28-08 8:32 AM
Another shell game. Instead of where is the pea it's where is the money? Now you see it now you don't. The check is in the mail!

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Special Sections  Football Preview 2010  Local News  Blogs  Sports  Life  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries