Arson Charge Won’t Hold
By ANNIE DIMMICK
POSTED: June 4, 2008
MOUNDSVILLE — An arson charge against Lt. Daniel Holmes Jr. — son of Moundsville Volunteer Fire Department’s chief — has been dismissed.
Another Moundsville volunteer — Blaine Alan Vanscyoc — was convicted of a misdemeanor Monday for setting fires in the city. And a juvenile who also admitted involvement was classified as a delinquent in Juvenile Court and placed on supervised probation until his 18th birthday, according to Marshall County Prosecutor Jeffrey Cramer.
Cramer said Tuesday that a third-degree arson charge against Holmes Jr., 22, has been reviewed by a Marshall County grand jury, but the case will not proceed.
“As the case against Holmes was being prepared to be presented to the grand jury, it was determined that while we may have been able to secure an indictment from the grand jury under a ‘probable cause’ standard, the evidence against him was clearly insufficient to obtain a conviction at trial with a ‘beyond all reasonable doubt’ standard,” Cramer said. “The Holmes case has been dismissed without prejudice at this time.”
Cramer said if additional evidence against Holmes should be found, the case could be presented to a grand jury. However, he said the discovery of additional evidence is unlikely, adding that Holmes has maintained his innocence since the charges were filed.
Holmes is the son of the department’s chief, Daniel Holmes Sr., and Christy Holmes, who also is a firefighter.
He, along with Vanscyoc and the juvenile were charged with setting several Dumpster fires last July.
In Marshall County Circuit Court on Monday, Vanscyoc pleaded guilty to one count of destruction of property — a lesser offense included in his four arson indictments. He also was indicted on three counts of setting fires, but those charges were dismissed as part of the plea agreement — two with prejudice and one without.
As part of his plea agreement and at the recommendation of Cramer, Vanscyoc will not spend time in prison. Cramer said he made the recommendation because Vanscyoc recently enlisted in the military.
“He graduated from John Marshall a couple weeks ago,” Cramer said. “If he’s convicted of a felony, for the next 50-60 years he’ll have that felony conviction following him, most likely preventing him from many job and educational opportunities in life. Having another unemployed convicted felon on our streets benefits no one.
“By our plea agreement, allowing him to enter military service, he has a chance to put the actions of an immature 18-year-old behind him and become a productive member of society,” Cramer added. “I will consider it a breach of our agreement if he receives anything but an honorable discharge from the service.”
Jim Burton, president of the Moundsville VFD, could not be reached for comment at press time Tuesday.
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-6 | Post a comment
|
afriend2
|
|
|---|---|
|
06-21-08 9:45 PM
|
For some reason it doesn't seem fair for the Holmes's boy and the Vanscyoc boy to have their name all over the news when there was another boy who was involved. They done wrong and the vanscyoc boy is taking most the heat. From knowing this boy as he grew up, he was a very good kid. His mom done the best she could do and that, she done a good job. Sometimes kids tend to get caught up with the wrong friends and i believe that is what happen to the vanscyoc boy. Even though this will be with him, I believe he will show everyone who he truly is. Keep up the good work mom and continue to stand by your son. Be all you can be Blaine! A true friend!
|
|
LK0812
|
|
|
06-09-08 11:12 AM
|
Rico, so you know more about the evidence than the police detectives and the prosecutor's office, which I know for a fact, were in agreement that the charges should be dismissed. As well as the two who were convicted of the crimes both saying that Holmes wasn't involved.
|
|
RICO23
|
|
|
06-07-08 10:18 AM
|
No I know personaly about the evidence the police had including video. Pretty funny that mom and dad were leaving the department then as soon as their sons charges are dropped they are back like nothng happened. The dept is tarnished because of this act.
|
|
LK0812
|
|
|
06-06-08 3:32 PM
|
Your absolutely right IMDMom, the Holmes boy's case is dimissed because of lack of evidence yet RICO here thinks he must be guilty because the police charged him and someone must have been paid off. The NR can be faulted to a degree, over half this story is about a charge that was dropped when in fact the charges against Holmes were dropped in early April.
|
|
IMDMom
|
|
|
06-04-08 8:13 PM
|
The NR is picking up the slack. For someone who had charges dropped due to lack of evidence, they sure keep splashing his name across the paper. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? They hae splashed his name in the papers more than the child abusers.
|
|
RICO23
|
|
|
06-04-08 3:52 PM
|
Of course the charge won't "hold". Lets see his dad has been in the MVFD forever along with his wife. It sounds like some under the table money to me. But do you want to know the whole kicker of the incident. They are letting the SON BACK into the MVFD. From what I heard mom and dad were leaving the dept until charges were dropped.Yes I know the charges were dropped because they did have enough for a 100% conviction. What a joke of a dept. They have ruined all the hard work from the members of the past. Looks like it is still the good ol boys club.
|





